RULE GOVERNED BEHAVIOR

 

REASONING IN CHIMPS

Transitive inferential reasoning (Gillan & Premack)

Train: A<B<C<D<E

Test: B vs. D

Analogical reasoning

Perceptual analogies

Conceptual analogies

Suggests they understand second-order relations

LANGUAGE

Background

The position of the behaviorists

The position of the linguists

Language in chimps

Early attempts to teach a chimp language

Kelloggs raised a chimp with their own child

Washoe (Gardners)

Learned american sign language

Problems of in interpretation

Sarah (Premack)

Learned about arbitrary plastic symbols (about 130 words)

Sarah understands many of the basic structures of language

Yes/no questions

Negation

Class concepts (e.g., color, size)

Quantifiers (all, none, some)

Logical connectives (if then)

Metalinguistic structures (e.g., name of)

Wh-- interogatives (e.g., where, when)

Evidence the symbol causes her to "think" of the object it represents

Limitations

She does not use language in a productive fashion

She does not understand complex syntactic structures

Language in pygmy chimps (Savage-Rumbaugh)

Kanzi acquired basic language through observation

Uses language in a productive fashion

Not only to request things for himself but also to talk about others

Has also learned to recognize spoken words

Did so without explicit training

 

Return to the Psyc606 homepage